Swift `Sendable`: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

Sendable tells the Swift compiler “this value is safe to share across concurrent code (different tasks/actors) without data races.” It’s a compile‑time safety net. (Swift.org)

What `Sendable` means

Formal idea: A type that conforms to Sendable can be passed between concurrent contexts (e.g., between tasks or across actor boundaries) without risking data races. The compiler enforces this at build time. (Swift.org)
Marker protocol: Sendable has no methods; it expresses a guarantee that the type is safe to share. (That’s why it’s often called a marker protocol.) The feature was introduced by SE‑0302 along with @Sendable closures. (GitHub)

Mental model: If two pieces of code might run at the same time, values you pass between them must be either:

Independent copies (typical for value types like struct), or
Protected behind isolation (e.g., actor), or
Immutable and carefully designed (some final classes), or
Explicitly marked “I know this is safe” using @unchecked Sendable (escape hatch; use sparingly). (Apple Developer)

Where it shows up in real code

You’ll care about Sendable when you:

Pass values across actor boundaries (e.g., from a UI‐isolated type to a background actor). The values must be sendable. (Swift.org)
Create tasks or task groups and pass data into their work closures. Those closures are checked for safe captures (see below). (docs.swift.org)
Write async APIs that accept or return values which might be used from other tasks. Declaring Sendable constraints makes intent clear and enforces safety in generic code. (Swift.org)

How Swift checks `Sendable`

Value types (`struct`, `enum`)

Usually automatic. Value types get implicit Sendable if all stored properties are Sendable. You don’t even need to write : Sendable most of the time. (Swift.org)

struct User /* : Sendable (implicit) */ {
    let id: UUID       // Sendable
    var name: String   // Sendable
}

Reference types (`class`)

Classes aren’t value copies; they share state. So the compiler is stricter.
You can conform a class to Sendable when it is designed to avoid shared mutable state (e.g., final and effectively immutable, or its state is safely synchronized).
Special case: @MainActor classes are implicitly sendable, since the main actor serializes access to their state. (This is how many UI types remain usable with concurrency.) (Apple Developer)

@MainActor
final class ImageCache {                // implicitly Sendable
    private var store: [URL: Data] = [:]
}

If you truly need a class that isn’t trivially safe, consider making it an actor instead (isolation guarantees safety by design), or use locks carefully with @unchecked Sendable (see below).

Actors

Actor references are safe to pass around — they’re isolated; only one task at a time can touch their mutable state. This is why actors are a common fix for Sendable problems. (Actors are part of Swift’s data‑race safety model.) (Swift.org)

For types you don’t own

The compiler needs to see all stored properties to verify safety, so checked conformance (: Sendable) must be declared in the same file as the type. If you need to add conformance to a type in a different module/file, you must use @unchecked Sendable and take responsibility for safety. (Apple Developer)

Using `@Sendable` with closures

Functions and closures can’t “conform” to protocols, so Swift uses an attribute:

func doWork(_ job: @escaping @Sendable () -> Void) { /* ... */ }

Rules for @Sendable closures (simplified):

They might be called from multiple threads at the same time, so what they capture must be safe to access concurrently.
Therefore, the compiler forbids capturing mutable or non‑sendable values (e.g., a class instance that isn’t Sendable). (docs.swift.org)

Bad (captures a mutable class instance):

final class Counter { var value = 0 }
let counter = Counter()

func run(_ f: @escaping @Sendable () -> Void) { /* ... */ }

run {
    counter.value += 1     // ❌ capture of non-Sendable mutable state
}

Better (use an actor):

actor SafeCounter { private var value = 0; func inc() { value += 1 } }

let counter = SafeCounter()
run {
    Task { await counter.inc() }    // ✅ no shared mutable state
}

Tip: Capturing a let constant only helps if the type itself is Sendable. Writing let counter = Counter() doesn’t make a class magically safe — let stops reassignment, not mutation.

Adopting `Sendable`: step‑by‑step

Follow this checklist to add Sendable safely and calmly.

Step 0 — Turn on the checks

In Swift 6 language mode, data‑race safety (actor isolation + sendability) is enforced by default.
In Swift 5 mode, you can enable complete concurrency checking as warnings via the -strict-concurrency=complete flag (Xcode Build Settings or swiftc) or the equivalent Package.swift settings. This lets you fix issues before you flip your project to Swift 6 mode. (Swift.org)

Step 1 — Start with your data models

Prefer value types (struct/enum). They often become implicitly Sendable when their properties are sendable. If you need to make it explicit (for public API clarity), write struct Model: Sendable { ... }. (Swift.org)

Step 2 — Add constraints in generic code

When writing generic async code, constrain parameters to Sendable if they’ll cross concurrency boundaries:

func store<T: Sendable>(_ value: T) async { /* ... */ }

This makes intent clear and yields better diagnostics. (Swift.org)

Step 3 — Annotate closure parameters

If a closure might be called from other tasks (e.g., background work, task groups), require @Sendable:

func repeatAsync(times: Int, work: @escaping @Sendable () async -> Void) async {
    for _ in 0..<times { await work() }
}

This prevents callers from accidentally capturing unsafe values. (docs.swift.org)

Step 4 — Fix captures

Inside @Sendable closures, don’t capture:
- non‑sendable classes,
- mutable locals (var),
- or globals with shared mutable state.
Solutions:
1. Use an actor to guard mutation.
2. Copy values into sendable forms (often by switching a small class to a struct).
3. Limit scope so you pass only IDs/values, not whole objects. (docs.swift.org)

Step 5 — For classes, pick one of these designs

A. Make it an actor if it owns mutable state shared by multiple tasks.
B. Keep it a final class but make state effectively immutable (all let stored properties of sendable types).
C. Use @MainActor for UI‑bound classes; they are implicitly sendable. (Apple Developer)

Step 6 — Only if you must: `@unchecked Sendable`

If you interface with legacy or Objective‑C APIs and you know a type is safe (e.g., all access is behind a lock/queue), you can use:

extension FileHandle: @unchecked Sendable {}    // you must uphold safety

Warning: this skips compiler checks; you’re responsible for correctness. Prefer actor or value‑type refactors when possible. (Apple Developer)

Step 7 — Rebuild, read diagnostics, iterate

Swift’s error messages point at the exact capture or property that breaks sendability (e.g., “captured var in @Sendable closure”). Fix them one by one.

Common errors & quick fixes

Diagnostic (simplified)	Why it happens	Quick fix
“Capture of non‑Sendable type in a `@Sendable` closure”	Closure might run concurrently; you captured a mutable/class value.	Convert to `struct`/copy value, or use an `actor`, or make the class safely sendable. (docs.swift.org)
“Reference to captured `var` in concurrently executing code”	Capturing a mutable local in a `@Sendable` closure is unsafe.	Use a `let` copy, or wrap mutation in an `actor`. (docs.swift.org)
“Non‑Sendable type passed across actor boundary”	You’re sending a value from one isolation to another.	Make the type `Sendable` (value type), or use an `actor`. (Swift.org)
“Conformance to `Sendable` must be declared in the same file”	The compiler needs full visibility of stored properties.	Move the conformance next to the type. If you can’t, use `@unchecked Sendable` cautiously. (Apple Developer)
UI type can’t conform to `Sendable`	UI classes are mutable and not thread‑safe.	Mark the type `@MainActor` (implicitly sendable) and keep UI work on the main actor. (Apple Developer)

Design tips and patterns

Favor values for data, actors for stateful services. Data models → struct; shared mutable state → actor. This usually sidesteps Sendable headaches. (Swift.org)
Narrow what you pass. Pass IDs or small value snapshots instead of whole objects.
Make generic APIs honest. If your API may be used from other tasks, add : Sendable constraints and @Sendable closure parameters to catch mistakes earlier. (Swift.org)
Avoid the escape hatch unless necessary. @unchecked Sendable is useful when wrapping legacy code with your own locking, but it becomes your permanent maintenance debt. (Apple Developer)
Know the “weird but true” bits.
- Metatypes and some keypaths are considered sendable; Swift 6 also improves inference for method and key‑path references so you get fewer false warnings. (docs.swift.org)

Swift 6 notes (migration, “strict concurrency”, inference, and sending closures)

Strict concurrency / data‑race safety is a key Swift 6 theme. You can try it as warnings in Swift 5 mode (-strict-concurrency=complete) before upgrading. (Swift.org)
Inference improvements (SE‑0418). The compiler can infer Sendable for certain method references and key‑path literals so you don’t have to decorate everything by hand. You can also enable “Infer Sendable From Captures” in SwiftPM to reduce noise while migrating. (GitHub)
sending closures (Swift 6): Some standard APIs (e.g., Task initializers, task groups) now use sending closure parameters. A sending parameter transfers ownership so the caller can’t touch captured non‑sendable values after the call, which prevents races without requiring @Sendable. You’ll see diagnostics mentioning “sending closure risks causing data races” if you violate the rules. Think of it as a single‑transfer guarantee. @Sendable still matters widely; sending is an additional tool. (GitHub)

FAQ

Do I need to write : Sendable on every struct? No. Most value types become sendable implicitly when their stored properties are sendable. Add : Sendable when you want the guarantee to be part of your public API surface. (Swift.org)

Can classes be Sendable? Yes, but only when they can’t cause data races (e.g., final + immutable, or all access is synchronized). Otherwise, make them actors or keep them main‑actor‑isolated. (Apple Developer)

When is @unchecked Sendable OK? Only when you fully control access (e.g., all mutable state behind a lock/queue) and you’re willing to take responsibility if that changes later. Prefer safer designs first. (Apple Developer)

Why does my @Sendable closure reject var captures? Because it may run multiple times and concurrently. Capturing a var would allow racy mutation. Capture a let value or move the mutation into an actor. (docs.swift.org)

Worked examples

1) Making a model sendable (value type)

// Implicitly Sendable since all stored properties are sendable.
public struct TodoItem /* : Sendable */ {
    public let id: UUID
    public var title: String
    public var done: Bool
}

Why this works: value types are copied and don’t share mutable state across tasks. (Swift.org)

2) A generic async function that enforces `Sendable`

// Any value you "send" to the worker must be Sendable.
func runOnWorker<T: Sendable>(
    value: T,
    work: @escaping @Sendable (T) async -> Void
) async {
    await work(value)
}

This prevents callers from passing unsafe types or unsafe closures. (Swift.org)

3) Fixing a non‑sendable capture by using an actor

final class Metrics { var count = 0 }             // not sendable
let metrics = Metrics()

actor MetricsSink {                               // safe isolation
    private var count = 0
    func inc() { count += 1 }
}

let sink = MetricsSink()

func schedule(_ f: @escaping @Sendable () -> Void) { /* ... */ }

// ❌ Captures a class instance with shared mutable state.
schedule { metrics.count += 1 }

// ✅ Use the actor instead.
schedule { await sink.inc() }

4) Carefully using `@unchecked Sendable` for a wrapper

// Wrap a non-Sendable thing with explicit synchronization.
public final class LockedCounter: @unchecked Sendable {
    private var value = 0
    private let lock = NSLock()

    public func increment() {
        lock.lock(); defer { lock.unlock() }
        value += 1
    }
    public var current: Int {
        lock.lock(); defer { lock.unlock() }
        return value
    }
}

This compiles, but the safety is entirely your responsibility. Prefer actor unless you need Objective‑C interop or very specific performance behavior. (Apple Developer)

A quick migration recipe you can follow this week

Enable checks (-strict-concurrency=complete in Swift 5 mode or switch to Swift 6 mode). Build and list all diagnostics. (Swift.org)
Tackle data models first. Convert obvious classes to struct or actor. Rebuild. (Swift.org)
Annotate APIs. Add @Sendable to closure parameters that may run concurrently; add : Sendable constraints to generics. (docs.swift.org)
Fix captures. Replace shared mutable objects with actors, or restructure to pass values/IDs. (docs.swift.org)
Handle the stragglers. For types you don’t own, consider temporary @unchecked Sendable wrappers until upstream libraries adopt sendability. Track these in code comments. (Apple Developer)
Re‑enable the strictest mode. Once clean, keep strict checks on so regressions are caught early. (Swift.org)

Swift Sendable: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

Contents

Swift `Sendable`: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

Contents

What `Sendable` means

Where it shows up in real code

How Swift checks `Sendable`

Value types (`struct`, `enum`)

Reference types (`class`)

Actors

For types you don’t own

Using `@Sendable` with closures

Adopting `Sendable`: step‑by‑step

Step 0 — Turn on the checks

Step 1 — Start with your data models

Step 2 — Add constraints in generic code

Step 3 — Annotate closure parameters

Step 4 — Fix captures

Step 5 — For classes, pick one of these designs

Step 6 — Only if you must: `@unchecked Sendable`

Step 7 — Rebuild, read diagnostics, iterate

Common errors & quick fixes

Design tips and patterns

Swift 6 notes (migration, “strict concurrency”, inference, and sending closures)

FAQ

Worked examples

1) Making a model sendable (value type)

2) A generic async function that enforces `Sendable`

3) Fixing a non‑sendable capture by using an actor

4) Carefully using `@unchecked Sendable` for a wrapper

A quick migration recipe you can follow this week

Further reading

Wrap‑up

Navigation menu

Swift Sendable: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

Swift Sendable: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

Contents

What Sendable means

Where it shows up in real code

How Swift checks Sendable

Value types (struct, enum)

Reference types (class)

Actors

For types you don’t own

Using @Sendable with closures

Adopting Sendable: step‑by‑step

Step 0 — Turn on the checks

Step 1 — Start with your data models

Step 2 — Add constraints in generic code

Step 3 — Annotate closure parameters

Step 4 — Fix captures

Step 5 — For classes, pick one of these designs

Step 6 — Only if you must: @unchecked Sendable

Step 7 — Rebuild, read diagnostics, iterate

Common errors & quick fixes

Design tips and patterns

Swift 6 notes (migration, “strict concurrency”, inference, and sending closures)

FAQ

Worked examples

1) Making a model sendable (value type)

2) A generic async function that enforces Sendable

3) Fixing a non‑sendable capture by using an actor

4) Carefully using @unchecked Sendable for a wrapper

A quick migration recipe you can follow this week

Further reading

Wrap‑up

Navigation menu

Search

Swift `Sendable`: a practical, step‑by‑step guide (2025)

What `Sendable` means

How Swift checks `Sendable`

Value types (`struct`, `enum`)

Reference types (`class`)

Using `@Sendable` with closures

Adopting `Sendable`: step‑by‑step

Step 6 — Only if you must: `@unchecked Sendable`

2) A generic async function that enforces `Sendable`

4) Carefully using `@unchecked Sendable` for a wrapper